Thoughts on political clashes
Within the modern political landscape, many organizations make the mistake of believing that exposure is victory. They believe that posting clips and writing articles will win this ideological battlefield and that our enemy will lose simply by taking the moral high ground. When disruptions and physical confrontations occur without consequences, they form a precedent. If a movement cannot secure its own meetings, speakers, or rallies, then it is doomed to fail.
During the early 1920s, as communist agitation intensified and street violence became a recurring feature of nationalist rallies, organized defensive formations began to emerge. From the creation of the Blueshirts in Spain, the Blackshirts in Italy and England, and the Sturmabteilung in Germany, leftist agitation began to dwindle. Many will attempt to claim that the atmosphere was different then. What is different about a time when the State protected our ideological opponents, laid blame on us, and allowed them to intimidate and attack us? These historic movements understood that the only way forward is to fight back
.
The Nationalist and conservative movements have developed a pattern of predictable refusal to fight back. At every meeting and event, there are confrontations, repeated disruptions, and reactions rarely extending beyond complaining. Over time, this predictability became noticeable. Our ideological opponents recognized that their confrontations carried little immediate cost, and that they could harm us freely without any expectation of reprisal. A movement that allows this pattern to calcify creates a dangerous precedent: that it lacks the capacity to secure its own destiny.
The creation of the 3.0 scene was, in part, a reaction to this realization. The previous 2.0 scene was solely digital and wanted to be entirely intellectual, completely detached from the physical world. This newer emphasis on the Active Clubs and creating a more fitness and combat sports oriented scene is the fix to this issue. Training is not a spectacle; it is culture building. It creates an expectation that all the members will not be passive, but active participants within society.
Organizations that discourage any form of self-defense, particularly while promoting strength, are seen as weak. Groups who are unable to safeguard their leadership, meetings, and rallies will die. This is the entire point of the new 3.0 scene. We are meant to be that organization of men to maintain order. The role of combat sports in the scene is meant to be defensive, not aggressive. If you are unwilling to defend a small group of men, how can one expect you to carry the torch for a national movement? This is why any organization will cease to exist if it denies members their basic right to self-defense.
This is absolutely true. We must be able to resist Leftist violence. The whole point of such violence is to shut down not only Nationalist opposition, but any form of patriotism no matter how weak a variant.
I wholeheartedly agree that European patriots of the twenties and thirties were not only able to resist, but overcome Communist terror in the streets because of their ability to physically fight.
We are seeing a repeat of this on American soil with Antifa terrorists attacking any group which goes in any way against the Left. Too many Conservatives want to take the “high road” by not fighting ack.
By placing faith in false virtues .i.e. pacifism, such people are condemning their descendants to living in a Leftist/antiwhite hell. If we think that it is bad now, wait another decade or so.
One must not only be able to physically repel such attacks, but do so in a manner which would have a chilling effect on future attacks. Antifa are cowards when the odds even begin to be even, quick to use violence, but even quicker to cry when receiving a basic punch. The ability to fight back will diminish Leftist attacks, because they will not want to pay the price.
Thank God for the Active Club movement, Patriot Front and all Nationalist groups which incorporate physical training to restore the noble spirit of our people.
Thank You!