Shiloh Hendrix - An Example for American White Women Everywhere

Jack Carter

I’m not going to be talking about the recent trial of Shiloh Hendrix because it was one of the biggest shams the American legal system has ever seen. I hope the barren AWFL judge and the two Jewish swindlers that prosecuted her are held to account once Shiloh’s Attorney has gotten his pound of flesh. Instead, I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the character and appearance of Shiloh and how she handled herself despite facing a kangaroo court.

Shiloh arrived to court wearing what appeared to be a traditional Scandinavian dress, either paying homage to the Scandinavian settlers of Minnesota or because she forever lives in the sense of her heritage. She could have gone the conventional route and worn the business attire (or its hideous “boss woman” alternative with the pants) that women typically wear for court proceedings to try and appear more sophisticated, but she chose to express her heritage. Her hair was also arranged in a traditional European style, all in all exuding a classical European aesthetic that no doubt enraged the non-Whites and race traitors present. There is no question that Shiloh Hendrix is an attractive woman, but her appeal goes way beyond clothing and hairstyle.

Here at W2R we have often spoken about how your body language is as crucial to your aesthetic as the clothing you wear and the hairstyle you chose. Looking at this image of Shiloh, what does it say? She is about to be tried by a kangaroo court, she clearly has some intimation of that, but instead of looking nervous and out of sorts she’s holding her posture in a way that can only be described as ‘regal’. She is unwavering and ready to face the challenge ahead like a traditional woman of European descent.

This is the role model nationalist American White women should be looking at, not just because of her objective beauty or manner in which she dresses but because of how she carries herself and the values she holds. After all, it was those values and her ferocity to defend them that landed her in trouble in the first place. You don’t tolerate someone stealing from your own child, least of all a child whose parents — and people (Somalians) — already steal from your nation.

Sure, you can debate over whether or not using racial epithets was necessary, but personally, I don’t care. The older generations of the black community differentiate black people from hood types they call “niggers” based on behaviour anyway, and the behaviour of the provocative cameraman definitely constitutes “nigger” behaviour in the sense that is was deliberately confrontational, egotistical, provocative and marked by low impulse control. As for the argument that Shiloh demonstrated low impulse control by calling both the migrant baby and the Somali migrant cameraman “niggers”; imagine taking your child to the local park often only for you and your child to be surrounded by an entitled people that shouldn’t be there and are known to be violent and sexually aggressive with a penchant for thievery and fraud. It’s called “fatigue” for a reason and tolerance has its limits.

Would we advise American White women calling black people “niggers”? That’s not for us to say because the First Amendment exists for a reason, but we’re certainly not going to chastise or a disavow those that chose to use racial epithets. That being said, female European nationalists typically do not use racial slurs in public; partly due to hate speech laws but also because slurs in general are seen as uncouth, and their beauty, embraced femininity and refusal to apologise for who they are is enough to get a win over a non-White.

Let Shiloh be a beacon of inspiration for all of you young, nationalist White American women everywhere, but always remember the kind of women you descend from and act accordingly.